‘Girl with a Book’ initiative

Follow up your activities on the celebration of the Day of the Girl by promoting  ‘Girl with a Book Initiative’  Take example from Secretary General Ban-Ki-Moon.

Education of girls is a positive action towards eliminating gender based violence.  Link the two during this 16 day campaign to eliminate violence against women and girls.


United in Global Sharing … building the future we want

The Good Shepherd International Foundation is an Italian non profit organization established in 2008 to support the missions of the Good Shepherd Sisters in the developing world.  The Foundation is based in Rome and works in partnership with the Good Shepherd Mission Development Corp. in USA and with the Good Shepherd partners in Africa, Asia and Latin America.

Goals include :
■Ensure economic and social justice for women and children who suffer from
■Violence, abuse and exploitation worldwide.
■Cancel the shame of human trafficking, a modern form of slavery.
■Eradicate poverty through a fair and sustainable development.
■Build a world of peace.     Read more at http://www.fondazionebuonpastore.org/


The United Nations Agenda has all these issues in focus – Human Rights, – CEDAW   http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cedaw/sessions.htm ;   Sustainable Development: Outcome of Rio+20 Conference  ‘The Future we Want’  http://www.uncsd2012.org/thefuturewewant.html (6 languages of the UN)  Empowerment, Poverty Eradication, Full Employment and Decent Work,  and Social Integration – Theme of the Commission for Social Development February 2013  http://social.un.org/index/CommissionforSocialDevelopment/Sessions/2013.aspx

The Elimination of Violence Against Women and Girls is the theme of the Commission on the Status of Women, March 2013   http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/csw/57sess.htm  ; Urging the implementation of the Social Protection Floor at national level following Recommendation 202 from the International Labour Confernece in June 2012  http://www.ilocarib.org.tt/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1895:new-ilo-recommendation-on-social-protection-floors&catid=117:news-room&Itemid=1035  Following the issue of Human Trafficking through Article 6 of CEDAW, and UNODC http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/human-trafficking/index.html?ref=menuside  and at national level.

A lot is happening –  There are new hopes, desires for new committments, new concepts as we move forward.

A good document to read is Realizing the future we want for all (1) Report to the Secretary General from the UN System Task Team on the Post 2015 UN Development Agenda.  http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/librarypage/poverty-reduction/realizing-the-future-we-want/    A vision for the future that rests on the core values of human rights, equality and sustainability.  Four key dimensions of a more holistic approach: (1) inclusive social development; (2) inclusive economic development; (3) environmental sustainability; and (4) peace and security. See a diagram for this on page 24.

Become aware of phrases like ‘post 2015 development agenda’.  What does it mean?   Sustainable Development Goals?  What are these?     Paragraph 92 of ‘Realizing the Future We Want for All’  reads

“92. Implementation of a post-2015 development agenda will depend, critically, on effective governance capacities at national, local and municipal levels, including political commitment and leadership; and on the legal and economic empowerment of people, especially those most excluded, and of their civil society organizations, to participate effectively in national and local decisionmaking.  As such, governance is an essential issue within all four of the dimensions  outlined above. ”

   Follow the Special Rapporteur on Extreme Poverty and Human Rights – Ms. Magdalena Sepulveda  Carmona.    http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Poverty/Pages/SRExtremePovertyIndex.aspx                                                             Read her book  HumanRightsApproachToSocialProtection (1)   

A ‘regreatable’ ending to CSW 56 – The word used by some Member States to sum up the fact that there are no agreed conclusions.

Yesterday March 14th the UN Journal indicated two things a) that the CSW informal conclusion were convened from 10.00 – 1.00 and 3.00 – 6.00 p.m. and b) that the Commission on the Status of Women would hold its 19th meeting in order to conclude its work for the 56th session.
Today, March 15th, I went for the meeting. CSW 56 ended with NO agreed conclusion! In the final remarks the Chair of the Bureau – H.E. Ms Marjon V. Kamara (Liberia) expressed her disappointment and said that she would prepare a Chair’s Summary to reflect agreements reached. Ms Michelle Bachelet, Executive Director, Under Secretary General for the United nations, was also present and expressed her disappointment despite the many good discussion, initiatives, participation and involvement by both member states and NGO’s. Michelle Bachelet noted that there were 2,015 NGO representatives from 429 organizations present and that there were 300 parallel events outside the UN discussing, sharing and networking for the empowerment of rural women. Member states had 70 parallel events some in collaboration with NGO, sharing best practices and strategizing for the future. So one wonders how in the context of so much activity promoting the empowerment of Rural Women, a state of ‘impasse’ is reached when it comes to negotiating the agreed conclusions? In my experience of the conditions in which rural girls and women live from Ethiopia, to Egypt, to Kenya, to Madagascar, and from Sabah, East Malaysia to India and Thailand why can the member states together not put forward agreed conclusion to uphold the human rights of girls and women and to provide basic services of water and sanitation, education and health? Why do member states not want to invest girls and women to develop agriculture ensuring national food security and food sovereignty? Why did member states not work on having agreed conclusions implement ting the social protection floor initiative globally, guaranteeing human rights and basic services coupled with a cash transfer to every rural girl and woman? Wouldn’t that be progress? Such provision would certainly limit the supply side of girls and women fleeing poverty and finding themselves trafficked for sexual and labour exploitation.
No agreed conclusions for CSW 56! Regrettable said the spokespersons for the CARICOM Member States to the UN , Iran, Denmark for the EU, Zimbabwe for the African States, USA, Peru, Pakistan, Norway, Cuba, Nicaragua, Iceland, Switzerland, Mexico , Russian Federation, Canada, Russia, Turkey, Japan and Australia. (Cuba, Iran, Japan, Nicaragua, Russian Federation, Zimbabwe and the USA are members of the Commission). All member states that spoke paid tribute to the Chair of the negotiations H.E. Carlos Garcia from El Salvador and other Bureau members. But why were there no agreed conclusions? NGO’s were permitted to be present during the first reading of the compilation text on March 2 but after that negotiations were in ‘closed’ sessions. A negotiating text was shared with NGO’s on March 8th. You can read this text at http://www.ngocsw.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/2-March-CSW-Compilation-Document.pdf CSW was adjourned on March 9th to give time to complete the negotiation.
As NGO’s are not permitted to observe the intergovernmental negotiating process one must infer and read between the lines. For certain the ‘impasse’ was not reached due to inability to implement globally, the social protection floor initiative! Words such as ‘intransigence’, ‘inflexible mind sets’, seeking to ‘dilute international agreements’, ‘opposition from one delegation’, ‘several delegations tried to bring their own views and opinions to bear’, – these are the rationales we heard from member states that spoke. It seems that the ongoing struggle towards the empowerment of women suffered a defeat today with no agreed conclusions from the Commission on the Status of Women. Why is so threatening to have a girl or woman take control her own life? This is seen clearly when it comes to a girl or women, having a real education on the true meaning of sexuality and access health care. Why is it that the words ‘gender equality’ evokes such primal fear as to stop negotiations? But these same underlying ‘fears’ permit the degradation of girls and women subjecting them to human trafficking for sexual exploitation and labour, is abusive of them for prostitution, mutilating their bodies through female genital mutilation and cutting, forbidding them to have an education, condemning them to death for sexual transgressions, sexualizes them for profit while condemning them to lives of poverty and violence in remote rural areas without access to basic human rights and services. What can be done to bring sanity to the process? Regrets that ‘working methods take an undisciplined trend’ and regrets about the ‘inefficient use of time’ are not very helpful or empowering of rural women! ‘Moral hazards’! ‘Moral evaluations’ are evoked to prevent women being empowered! The CSW needs ‘rational decisions’ for all women!

CEDAW – 30th Anniversary

UNIFEM has created an excellent website regarding the 30th anniversary of CEDAW.  The site address is:  http://www.unifem.org/cedaw30/

Additionally, there will be an event at the United Nations on December 3 celebrating the anniversary of the treaty and the 10th anniversary of the Optional Protocol.  For information about the event, go to:  http://www.unifem.org/cedaw30/events_calendar/event.php?EventID=3

Why not visit these sites and learn more about CEDAW!

44th Session of CEDAW July 20 – August 7, 2009 in New York

The 44th session of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women opened in New York on Monday last, July 20th, 2009

The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) is the body of independent experts http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cedaw/membership.htm     that monitors implementation of the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women. http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/cedaw.htm  

The CEDAW Committee consists of 23 experts on women’s rights from around the world. http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cedaw/membership.htm

During its sessions the Committee considers each State party report and addresses its concerns and recommendations to the State party in the form of concluding observations.

During the 44th session the following countries where Good Shepherd has a presence are being considered: Japan, Spain and Switzerland.  If you visit this site you can read the Government report, questions posed by the experts, written responses by the Government and the NGO Statements. http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cedaw/cedaws44.htm

The committee members are very busy while in session.  Full days are provided for each country being considered.  There are informal meetings for Non Government Organizations (NGO).

At this current session a general recommendation on older women is being proposed and a second on the economic consequences of divorce.  What is a general recommendation?  Visit this web site: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cedaw/comments.htm

Procedures for NGO participation in CEDAW can be read here.   http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cedaw/docs/NGO_Participation.final.pdf

The 45th session will be held in Geneva in January 2010 and the following countries where Good Shepherd is present will be presented:  Egypt, Netherlands and Central America – Panama http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cedaw/cedaws45.htm   Already the government reports have been submitted and the CEDAW experts have formulated their questions.  NGO have also presented their statements.

The 46th session will be in July 2010 when Albania, Argentina and Australia will be considered.  Here is an opportunity for the new community going to Albania to follow proceedings.  The country reports are already available http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cedaw/cedaws46.htm

The countries for a future session are already listed and reports recived in June /July 2009 are available in their original language.  http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cedaw/cedaws_future.htm

Countries include the Czech Republic, Kenya, Malta and Singapore.

Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW)

From July 20th to August 7th 2009 the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women will meet in New York for its 44th Session.  Good Shepherd has a presence in the following countries being heard – Japan, Spain and Switzerland.  

If you click on this link  http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cedaw/cedaws44.htm                                                                       you can read the provisional agenda for the session together with the reports of the various countries.    You can see the dates and proposed countries for the 45th and 46th sessions (2010)  and the proposed countries for a future session by clicking on   http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cedaw/sessions.htm     

Argentina was named for the 44th session in July but now I read that it has been postponed.   Sr Monica Scavuzzo Osquiguil from Argentina had received her visa and planned to attend the session on behalf of Good Shepherd in New York.